Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RIAZ versus MUMTAZ ALI THROUGH LEGAL HEIRS

Sections 8, 9 and 42 Recovery of Partnerships The dispute between un-divided joint land was related to the acquisition of un-divided shareholder land, applicants demanded the acquisition of possession under section 8 of the Special Relief Act 1877. Was, as it is claimed, disposed of by the respondents, while the defendants declared the title of the trial court, dismissing the case filed by the petitioners and dismissing it. Under Section 9 of the Special Relief Act, 1877, their case is considered as one, the two parties were joint partners in the jointly divided accounts and their remedy was to guide all other stakeholders in Khata as per law. To get the distribution. The shareholder was acquitted by another partner, the remedy being a division of common property or a lawsuit under section 9 of the Spec. The suit for the possession of the C Relief Act, 1877, but not a regular case under section 8 of the Special Relief Act, 1877, was not applicable. The suit filed by the applicants cannot be considered one under section 9 of the Special Relief Act, 1877. Because there was no specific concrete action. That they were expelled from the ground illegally or forcibly disputed. No convincing evidence was presented by the applicants which showed that they were expelled within six months of the lawsuit filed by them, in support of their contention that the applicants had no The independent witness was not presented accordingly \ r \ n \ r \ n jobs for fresh advocates from Swabi lawyer