Find a Lawyer

ABID HUSSAIN versus STATE

Sections 497 (5) and 498 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 452 and 34 bail, were against the dismissal of serious allegations that they had committed adultery in the complainant's house and that women were highly humiliated and guilty. Had not been charged. The defendant was not able to disclose any misconduct or illnesses by the complainant against the accused persons nominated in the FIR and he was not able to identify any unique feature of the case which guarantees him pre-arrest. Was entitled to give. They were trying to produce evidence in their favor and were misusing the pre-arrest bail exception. The order allowing the accused to pre-arrest bail had revealed that the trial court had given an unreasonable weight to the FIR court, allowing bail, for a delay of three days. The complainant was a short-haul wagon driver, and as the police generally showed hesitation and hesitation in recording other FI rupees, it should be noted that the case was overwhelming with the majority of the cases. Our point in bailing the accused was that the police had come to the conclusion that no commitments had been made and that according to Section 452, the PPC record was not implemented otherwise the police investigation It is alleged that the accused made a mistake in the complainant's house. , PPC, was fully enforceable, bail was withdrawn before the arrest of the accused in the circumstances, except that one of the accused was told that the person was an old man and online advocate from Darya Khan lawyer