Find a Lawyer

ZULFIQAR ALI ALIAS BILLA versus STATE

Section 9 (c) Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 156 (2) Definition of Evidence. Both prosecution witnesses gave details of the incident, the total effect of the evidence of both witnesses was that at that time each packet of four had a weight. Each packet was recovered and weighed 1 kilogram and the slabs contained in each packet were not counted. If there was a contradiction between the evidence and the rehabilitation counselor, then said that the cross examination brought the contradiction on record. Could have been, but no question regarding such contradiction was brought to the record unless otherwise it was stated that the contradiction would not be fatal to the prosecution case, a phrase in the evidence, not read in isolation. Could have taken into consideration all the evidence of a witness and the total effect of the statement was to be given, the prosecution's witness In his statement, the conscience did not disclose that each packet contained two slabs or one slab, but he remained silent. The total weight of the 8 packets in each packet was 8020 grants and the net weight of the slabs was 7900 grants. No contradiction, the sealed property and the chemical analyst received the property received by the complainant at a location under the circumstances. The statement said that he had sought permission to investigate the case through the D-section PCIA. However, if it is investigated by an officer who was not authorized by law, then section 156 (2). ), May not be inquired after a CCP investigation. The investigation, the court took seriously, if any illegal activity was committed during the investigation, it was treated as well and said that best law firms from More kunda lawyer