Find a Lawyer

MUNICIPAL COMMITTEE, MANDI BAHAUDDIN, TEHSIL PHALIA THROUGH CHAIRMAN versus PROVINCE OF PUNJAB THROUGH DISTRICT COLLECTOR, GUJRAT

Section 42 to declare that in this case it is claimed that the plaintiff was the exclusive owner of the transfer of this property from the settlement and then the order of transfer to the defendant, if any, was invalid. The rights of the plaintiff were not affected. The allotment of land was proved by the documents that the defendant claimed to be the owner, through open auction records he had proved on the basis of the purchase of the property that the defendant had not purchased the property and it was The record was prepared by the plaintiff together. The defendant along with the department staff failed to record a settlement order, a sales certificate, a department order for the sale confirmation and auction price receipt in favor of the auction list. The registration and mention of this entry will not prove the purchase of the property through the CSC V Plaintiff Allotment in the register; nothing done once for the plaintiff cannot be canceled for not collecting the balance amount, because the authorities You can only receive the same amount as the residual income tax deduction is not part of the property compensation pool. It is, therefore, selling by auction was illegal suite of applicants, the decision was online advocate from Digri lawyer