Find a Lawyer

FAREED ALAM KHAN versus CONTROLLER GENERAL OF PAKISTAN

R 4 (I) (b) (i) Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 The major penalty for the reduction of three lower phases in time to large-scale penalties is the reduction of three lower stages Was applied. After inquiring against him on allegations of inadequacy and mismanagement, the appellant did not dispute the data tampering with the computer at that time and place, but affirmatively presented the results in a negative manner. Will be. It reflects the alleged role of the principal suspect, who was an interested party and allegedly responsible for the tampering, but he was negligent and the appellant, who was a minor fry, was convicted if the principal. If no action was taken against the accused, what could be the case? On the basis of action against the appellant on the basis that it was alleged that he had shared with the principal accused, there was no ocular evidence of tampering with computer data against any of the three persons. It was alleged in the case that what was proved against the appellant was considered as nothing but negligence, but he was treated with disagreement around which the whole incident revolved, Of course, for the appellant to exercise caution in the future by the competent authority, the impending order was set aside and all the benefits to the appellant's timely stage Will be restored with immigration advocates from Bahawalnagar lawyer