Find a Lawyer

CH. MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS

Section 12, 13 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 3A (2) (B) Government \ Servants (Qualification and Discipline) Rules, 1973, RR 3, 4 (1) (B) ( 1), Appellants 5 and 6 challenged two orders in their appeal to the lower level and voluntary retirement appellant. One was converted from Grade V to Grade IV and the other was accepted by the authorities under the Voluntary Retirement Scheme. Appellant was converted from Grade V to Grade IV. There was an inquiry against it. The appellant admitted in the process of investigating discipline, corruption and numerous other charges, was provided with a copy of the prosecutor's statement and never complained about not giving him a defense opportunity in the departmental appeal. Was The allegations against the appellant were formally investigated which gave them the opportunity to defend and, in the circumstances, it cannot be said that the appellant was not provided with any opportunity of defense or against any regular. There was no inquiry which led to no injustice or discrimination. In the proceedings against it, the appellant had fulfilled the allegations against the appellant and it was proved that the appeal against the unknown order was dismissed, in which case the appeal of the voluntary retirement scheme was approved. The developer alleged that he had not opted for such a retirement and in relation to the voluntary retirement scheme, this option form was fake and not. The appellant signed by him was unlawful in this regard property advocates from Shamsabad lawyer