Find a Lawyer

CH. MUHAMMAD ASLAM versus WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY THROUGH CHAIRMAN, WAPDA HOUSE, LAHORE

Sections 1 (3) (4), 2 (C), 3, 11 and 12 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 was directed to enforce a penalty appeal against the appellant under which 279 An appeal for fines was granted under a 2003 order. Removal from the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, 2000, while the removal of the Appellant from the Service (Special Powers) Ordinance 2000 in 1996, will not apply to the Appellant as it was prior to its issuance of the Service. Has retired. The ordinance to remove the ordinance from service (special powers) came into force in May, 2000, with no previous effect, under which the proceedings say that no law could be taken against the appellant beyond its enforcement. He was retired a long time ago and due to which he was executed. A specific date, then, should be taken into account under the law because the cause of action was related to the purpose of counting the knowledge limit only if the plaintiffs knew about the misconduct. F. Appellant, such knowledge may be related to the purpose of setting a time limit for initiating legal proceedings and was not related to the date of knowledge for the application of the law under which the action was to be taken. Should apply to this date. The fact that the cause of action was born was that the impugned order was not approved under the correct law; they were, in a way, left in the circumstances. pakistani advocates Quetta lawyer