Find a Lawyer

ABDUL RAZZAQ versus SENIOR MEMBER, BOARD OF REVENUE, PUNJAB, LAHORE

Section 2 (d), 3 and 10 of the Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), the removal of the Section 4 Patwari from the Service Selection Committee on the relaxation of the recruitment, the appellants were selected as Patwaris on the merit. And they had an appointment. It was regularly notified and then the appointment of the appellants was canceled and they were disqualified as patwaras who had double residency and applied for more than one sub-division for recruitment. Was because the Tribunal had accepted the Patwari's appeals against the cancellation of his appointment. The service was ordered to be reinstated and the period between removal and dismissal was considered a leave because the clear and unambiguous order of the tribunal was not complied with and instead removed the appellant from the service (special powers). ) Was removed from the job under section 3 of the Act. There was no contradiction in compliance with the Ordinance, 2000 Tribunal's order that the government's authority and further proceedings against the appeals were without jurisdiction. Service (Special Powers) Ordinance, The basis of action under section 3 of the removal of Punjab from 2000 was that the person to be prosecuted should be a person of the Government or a Corporation Service Appellant. Only the status of a public servant may be restored; if the compliance of the tribunal's decision was against the government agencies against those who were not public servants, then no sanctity was observed with the executive district officer (Revenue) order. Were with And to overcome crime jobs for fresh advocates from Takhtbai lawyer