Find a Lawyer

MUMTAZ HUSSAIN versus STATE

Article 2 30 34 and the definition of evidence of evidence is contradictory to the evidence of the prosecution's evidence against the medical evidence. The accused persons had no common motive for the murder of the victim. All the accused were residents of the scene and none of them was his There was no enmity with committing the murder. It is alleged that there was a dispute between a co-accused and the victim which resulted in the murder of the victim, not convinced that the matter was not reported to the police and how serious the case was, the record. Did not come up and who was involved in the dispute was not explained, seemingly an intended purpose was merely to provide the prosecutor's version with the help of the prosecution version that the three accused fired firearms with their own guns. And there was no doubt that the fourth one played an empty hand in crime. An overview of the fact that the victim had just received a version of a firearm prosecution that was assured one of the accused, who had a quarrel or an affair with the complaining party, had fired his gun. A man was shot in the chest with a gunshot wound that later collapsed at the request of an injury prosecution report that the Franzic Science Laboratory report was positive and confirmed that three weapons were present. Was used to lose weight in view of the disproportionate medical report, which shows that the victim suffered only one arm injury. It was only the fire of one of the accused who targeted the deceased, and the participation of the other three accused was not proved by the evidence available. Accused in case records and environmental conditions family advocate from Daulat Pur lawyer