BASHIR AHMAD versus STATE
Sections 316, 338A and 109 Criminal Procedure (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VII of 1979), Section 10 Proof of Defamation Prosecution Case found valid on the death statement, medical evidence, chemical examiner's report and pathologist's report. Confirming the evidence, especially of the female doctor who performed the post-mortem on the body of the deceased, and the chemical inspector's report also alleged that the death was declared by the prosecution witness. Who was not even the mother of the slain defense. The controversial presence of the deceased mother in the house in which the deceased died last, nor the fact that she met the deceased before her death, was challenged by the deceased's mother not called a witness. Maybe, because the interested witness was the one who had the motive, allegedly biased, biased or biased and biased towards someone's party, and was pointed out by some motive. Got away Against the accused, but no record was brought against the said witness, though the relationship itself was not a standard of exclusion for the exclusion of evidence which was otherwise credible and in the case of a single accused. In the case, the defendant's relatives rarely or truly pardoned the offender responsible for the crime, the alleged delay in filing the FIR, it was satisfactorily explained that the victim The mother's mother found herself committing adultery with the accused, it cannot be said that the accompanying female accomplice of the mechanism was a co-accused. Participation is open. The slaughtered horses
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
registration advocate from Shahkot lawyer