Find a Lawyer

YOUSAF MASIH versus STATE

The testimony of section 10 (2) of the evidence was charged in the defense of the defendants' plea, they both consider themselves male and female. Both of them have accepted Islam and then entered into marriage together. However, he cannot be held guilty of committing adultery. When two possibilities were available, the offense in favor of an accused would be considered under the Section 10 (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance 1979 of the offense whenever the offense was intended or in the knowledge of the accused. In the present case, those accused of adultery after being married and marrying each other, after entering into the marriage, could not be convicted of adultery commission, with no direct evidence that the accused had committed a crime. Committed adultery with another. The litigation was prosecuted only in cases where the female defendant was pregnant, obtaining a pregnancy, though it must be concluded that the conclusions must be drawn. Pregnancy, but not self-pregnancy, was no evidence that there was no doubt that pregnancy was the result of deliberate adultery. If a woman asserts herself to be the wife of her partner, she has accompanied him. Have sex, though it may be wrong, but it should not be. It would be unsafe for the commission of adultery and it would be unsafe to maintain the conviction on the strength of the evidence brought by the prosecution on record that it was alleged that they had been acquitted of the charges against them. attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Piplan lawyer