Find a Lawyer

RIAZ AHMAD versus STATE

The admission of the definitions of Articles 10 and 16, even if the victim was not witnessed because of the testimony of the victim because she was dead, the prosecution's evidence was sufficient to prove beyond any doubt that the accused was in fact Had committed the crime against him, he was the father of the slain girl. And the other prosecution witnesses, who were the victim's brother, were essentially natural witnesses and their presence in the home at the appropriate time of the incident cannot be denied or doubted. Both said witnesses witnessed the rape of the victim, and their statement was fully supported. Medical evidence was reinforced and reinforced by the Chemical Examiner's report, which found that the vagina shrubs obtained from the infected stained with semen were undoubtedly the accusation of an unmarried girl. In the previous incident between the parties was clearly supportive of the abduction of another woman even though the Victim girl committed suicide and her statement before the police could not be strictly admissible in the evidence, Had presented a case in favor that was absurd in the circumstances The manufacturer or the witnesses had waived the fact that the perpetrator and had been falsely accused that the Victim girl could not be presented as a Witness Victim, in the case of Xena Bill Jaber, surely this was a very important witness, But in the present case, there was direct evidence of the prosecution's two witnesses, who, in these circumstances, successfully proved their case against the accused, the trial court upheld his conviction. famous supreme court advocate from Dinga lawyer