Find a Lawyer

MST. JAMILA JAN versus STATE

Section 10 (2), (3) defining the evidence FIR in this case was filed with considerable delay and there were some contradictions regarding the time of the incident, but stated that the delay in the FIR Regular statements were made, or even in cases of adultery, the delay in filing the report, would not necessarily mean that the complaint was false or that the consent of the women was a consenting party because such hesitation was quite natural. Even in Western societies, where education was high, women were aware of their rights and society. The development itself, delayed reporting of such cases was a common occurrence, but not reported in a large number of cases, the FIR shows that because the male suspect is a neighbor, and he has serious The complainant was threatened for the results, so the first report could not be filed. In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it was not appropriate and appropriate for the trial court to immediately charge the complainant girl for adultery. All denied that the adulteress had committed it several times with her on various occasions, saying that she had been targeted only once with the adulteress, and that, too, the gun point. But, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, no opportunity was found. In his affidavit statement, the substance of the case was discovered when a man accused the defendant in denying the allegation made by the complainant at the trial that the facts of the case were distorted by the police. Adultery was accused by Bill Woman of a woman, but nevertheless, Pa jobs for fresh advocates from Mangla lawyer