CHANASER ALIAS CHANOO versus STATE
In the conviction of Articles 324 and 397 evidence, the defendant was both a witness to the prosecution as well as a victim of the crime as they were both injured during the incident and one of them, who was injured in the shooting, immediately returned to F. The IR was entered. The identity of the two accused was charged with the recovery of a stolen motorcycle from the judicial magistrate before the accused was identified and prosecuted. The witnesses of the incident, on the international issue of their relationship, had no adverse effect, the litigation case against the accused was beyond any reasonable doubt, keeping the conviction of the accused, their sentences Was placed in the interest of the circumstances of the case. Justice, according to him
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
law websites from Kallur Kot lawyer
