Find a Lawyer

UMER FAROOQ AND OTHERS versus SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF INDUSTRIES AND PRODUCTION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD

Section 9 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Pakistan Steel Officers Services Rules and Regulation, 1989, RR 2 25, 2 33 and 2 34 According to the Appeal Sinners List of the Promotion Intelligence Service Tribunal, the name of the applicant The serial number was 26. While the other appellant's name was in the Serial No. 16 Departmental Promotion Committee, the names of the 38 deputy general managers out of which 19 were recommended to the rank of general manager / other defendants were recommended. Could be selected for selection, but it was also ACR. In order to qualify for the position of general manager, the last five years required a rating and a score of at least 70 marks; promotion of both appellants was not recommended as they achieved less than 70% marks. The appellants, on the other hand, accused the Central Circle of selecting other respondents, which was ignored. Appeals for promotion on the basis of confession were illegal as the quotation was not provided in the Pakistan Steel Officers Service Rules and Reg. The basic complaint of the appellants, 1989 appellant, was about the circumstance which was not proposed in the Pakistan Steel Officers Service Rules and Regulations 1989, but the rules were not banned for adoption. After the retirement of respondents for the development of employees who were promoted, who were not challenged before the Service Tribunal for a period of 11 months, it would not be fair to consider the progress of the appellants. Appeal requested, could not be approved under circumstances \ r \ n lawer from fb area from FR Bannu lawyer