Find a Lawyer

NASEER AHMAD BALOUCH versus CHAIRMAN, STATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN, KARACHI

Section 17 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Salary Appeal Limitations were not expected by the employer to extend the application of the limitation in the case of a salary employer, especially when it was public or government owned. Was a corporation, always very welcoming for employees. After claiming payment at a growing rate after adding his salary increase, then he had a consistent cause of action where claiming for increased salary or arrears, the employee always had a permanent cause of action. And it could not be treated as an appeal. The time restriction was to decide each case at its best when in the case of an employee who was given a clear cut final order that his claim for payment was not feasible for certain reasons, then the limit Will be the order in which an order has been passed in which the request for a limitation may be made. , Employers were not justified in saying that the appellant was not entitled to an annual increase. He said that the increment would have been part of his salary, as long as there was a permanent loss in salary every month while he was on the job. Cannot be sacrificed The employer's objection that the appeal was timed was withheld immigration advocates phone number from Skardu lawyer