MUHAMMAD SADDIQ versus DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL, PAKISTAN RAILWAYS POLICE, LAHORE
Section 3 (l) (a) (b) and (c) (III) and the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 serve appellant with a show cause notice on the charges of disqualification. Was removed from service after service. There was no inquiry against the appellant against mismanagement and corruption, but despite the fact that the appellant's authority denied the allegations of fact, there was no reason to issue a formal inquiry into the showcase notice. Hearing such serious and serious weaknesses in the disciplinary proceedings, the proceedings against the appellant were thwarted. The dismissal order of dismissal from the employment approved against the appellant could not be maintained. The same charges / charges within the specified period
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
immigration advocates phone number from Toru lawyer
