MUHAMMAD FAROOQ versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Section 2 (b), 3, 5, 6 and 7 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Applying the reduction of fines to the lesser post-appeal appellant while serving as deputy general manager in the organization. The position has been reduced. The main allegation against the appellant in the allegations of corruption after the inquiry against them was that he had set up a decorating office, without any official requirement, without any authority and without the permission of a competent authority, He was given an opportunity to defend himself. In which he was found guilty of the charge, setting up the office of decoration, without any authority, came under scandal, though a small action, in all probability, could be justified, but Without it the task was done. Described under Section 2 (b) of the Authorized Authority Appellant for removal of any reasonable permission or required permit, mismanagement of circumstances, unusual motion of an officer, and removal of a gentleman's service (special powers) ordinance, 2000 Yes, but the reduction in the rank imposed was very severe, because although the appellant's action was lacking in care and caution, it could not be positively possible. Appellant did not use the controversial office for his personal bedroom, but rather used as a conference room for public purposes. After setting up an additional office, the appellant could not benefit materially or otherwise. Either or otherwise, in view of the institution, the sentence for the reduction of the post was changed to prevent its two receipts for a period of two years, instructing the organization.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
how to become a advocate from Thul lawyer