Find a Lawyer

HAIDER SHAH versus INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, KARACHI

The Department proceeded on the charge that he and his accomplice were excluded from the Appellate Appeal of Section 4 Service, Tribunals Act 4 (1) (B) (iv), 5 and 6. Snatched a purse of a woman of Rs 500. And demanded more money and that he forcibly committed rape with her, then served him with the showcase notice and the appellant was dismissed, after which the appellant under the final showcase notice. Dismissed from employment without regular inquiry; in view of the seriousness of the allegations against the appellant, regular inquiry was necessary but a shortcut method of showcase notice after which the final showcase notice was adopted imposed on the appellant. Not with the consent of the parties, defamatory orders were set aside and the matter went on a regular basis. A remand was received for. Following the issuance of the showcase notice, the law required that the inquiry appellant be reinstated for the purpose of facing the inquiry which was to be disclosed in a thin specific period. immigration advocates email from Musakhel lawyer