NABI BUX versus DEPUTY INSPECTOR-GENERAL PAKISTAN RAILWAYS POLICE, LAHORE
Sections 3 (1) (a) (b) and (c) (iii), 5 and 11 Service Tribunal Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Appellant was removed from the job after issuing show cause notices, But without conducting an inquiry into the allegations of disqualification, corruption and misconduct against him, the formal inquiry against the appellant was terminated and despite the appellant's denial of serious allegations on the fact. He was fined without any personal charge. After hearing such serious and serious weaknesses in the disciplinary proceedings against the appellant it has been stated that no employee can be fined without regular inquiry and without hearing him, against the appellant. The removal order from the approved employment could not be retained, with the request of the circumstance case remanded to the authority so that the appellant could be reinstated and De Nauvo's disciplinary action would be initiated against the same charge. es within a specified period
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
