Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD AKBAR SHAHNAWAZ versus MANAGING DIRECTOR, PIAC, KARACHI

Section 3 and 5 of the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 dealt with the pay-related group to IV Appellant and the appellant was later acquitted during the hearing of the case, The department issued a charge sheet, was investigated and on the recommendation of the inquiry officer, the appellant was fined with a salary group Fifth to Fourth without waiting for a pending decision with the customs authority, although the authority had to issue The appellate court was not allowed to proceed with the approval, in the interest of justice it was Rutti should have waited for a final verdict, before his honor was acquitted on the same charge, a fine was imposed on the appellant, and as a result of the proceedings of the department, the competent authority had passed the previous order, While the decision was later made. The acceptance of the appeal against the order imposing a penalty on the appellant will result in the determination of the offense on the same charge which the appellant had been honorably discharged through the authorized jurisdiction forum, would hardly be considered appropriate. The unpaid order was set aside and consequently the applicant was reinstated to its original Pay Group V with benefits. top civil advocates from Daska lawyer