MUHAMMAD YOUNIS versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN AND OTHERS
Sections 3, 5 and 6 of the Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), appellant serving as a driver, were dismissed from section 4, dismissed on charges of theft of oil from a freight train. The hearing was made against the appellant, but he had nothing to do with it. Do not allow interrogation proceedings nor the opportunity to examine witnesses presented against it. The person experiencing the legality had the right to be involved in the proceedings and to testify against him was to be presented through a credit examination. Hereditary legal error suffered, the order of dismissal of the appellant could not be retained, the respondent was directed to restore the appellant and the same charges / allegations will be filed against him, within the specified period, back. The question of benefits will depend on. As a result of the investigation
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
