Find a Lawyer

AFTAB AHMED SOOMRO versus SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, MINISTRY OF PRODUCTION AND INDUSTRIES, ISLAMABAD

Rr 4 (1) (b) (iv), 6 and 7 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), dismissing Section 4 from employee employees who served as Deputy General Manager, were charged with gross negligence. After being investigated against, he was fired. Not only was it harmful to the interests of the authority, but it also caused a huge financial loss to employees, it was waived in two previous inquiries against it, but in the third inquiry, Consequently, the result of the earlier two inquiries was the result of which employee was deported, the third inquiry should have been accepted as contrary to the facts and principles of natural justice; Previous investigations could not be accepted against the reports, especially when the third inquiry officer was under trial. There is no need for a third inquiry into the pressure of fear of the former chairman of RTI when two investigating officers punished the employee. The third inquiry would mean that the authority was aiding the authorities to punish employees for their actions. In order to be punished, it was important that the authority should provide detailed reasons for the need for a third inquiry, but for no reason violated the principles of natural justice. It was decided by setting aside the deferred order that the employees were not subject to alleged misconduct or gross negligence. The employee was instructed to return to the job with back benefits. \ R \ n \ r \ n advocates from Thari Mirwah lawyer