ABDUL REHMAN SHAH versus CHAIRMAN OF PAKISTAN STEEL
Section 3 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Prior Appellant was not required to be removed from service as well as terminated employment with other officers, after filing an appeal against the dismissal order, Appellant was restored to full service with full benefits. For more than two years after the restoration, appellants were removed from their job after being charged for allegedly using political pressure / extra land for their appointments. Appellant's appointment was based on the recommendations of the Selection / Interview Committee consisting of senior officers whose recommendations were duly approved by the competent authority. No evidence of the authority appellant's use of political pressure could be presented by the prosecution in support of his claim and the alleged misconduct against the appellant could not be proved and the inquiry officer's report was false, illogical. And it was not based on any evidence to prove it. Appellant's appointment was due to a pool of influence that the appellant had successfully completed his investigation period and his appointment had been disputed more than a decade later, legally. Not Applicable The Authority had deliberately and dishonestly accused the appellant of using political pressure, removing appellant was a pre-planned, illegal and bad order. Responding to an impeachment order, respondents were instructed to reinstate the appellant with all incentives for a period of non-employment.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
