MRS. LUBNA ASIF AYUB versus PRESIDENT OF THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF PAKISTAN
Rr 3 (b), 4 (1) (a) (ii), 5, 6 and 7 Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 Apply the minor penalty to withhold an annual increase for one year. Initial penalties for retirement were imposed on the appellant, but the Department of Appeal amended the prevention of an increment for a period of one year and consequently the issuance of notice and some of the corruption and misconduct, etc. Appellant was fined after taking charge sheet from him on the charges. It has been shown that the appellant had been employed for almost nine years, the appellant was placed in suspension with another officer and his suspension was published in the press release of BPS 20, the charges against the appellant. A very detailed investigation was carried out, but according to their inquiry report, no allegation was made against them, but if any one was charged for any minor misconduct, then they were against the appellant. But they had secretly worked with him, causing them to face men. Harassment and harassment in previous years. It seems that there is a mindset to punish the appellant, although in the case of the appellant, the strictly double threat phrase was not strictly used, but it can be said that it was not only for the appellant twice. , But it was a matter of waxing three times. By allowing the appeal, the controversial order to withhold appellant's surrender for one year was set aside and he was entitled to the benefits of the increment that authorities withheld \ r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
