Section 26 of the Special Relief Act (Constitution of 1877), sections 8 and 42 suit jurisdiction for the suit land and possession the plaintiff claimed to own the land in the specified khasra number and on the basis of consolidating the income The same property was demanded. In the counter case under the West Pakistan Consolidation of Holdings Ordinance, 1969, the defendants resisted the plaintiff's claim and claimed to own the land in question number one, the trial court dismissed the case filed by the plaintiff and the plaintiff. Was dismissed, but the lower appellate court overturned those findings. And the case filed by the defendant was ruled in his favor while the plaintiff was dismissed. The property owners of all the landowners of the Maza'a (village) were consolidated in the process of stabilization and then divided according to the rights of each person or group of people in the measles. In the question number, the stability authorities gave the plaintiff's favor, and if the defendants had any claim in respect of this deficit number, then the defendants had the right to appeal in the case of consolidation, when the defendant in the khasra number in question If the right of the plaintiff was accepted, the plaintiff had to pay compensation on behalf of the alternative land, including any appeal against the confirmation of the stability proceedings, etc., therefore, the plaintiff and others with the owner of the dilapidated number in the jamabandi. As well as in the case of variations in the distribution of the land judgment and the decree passed by the lower appellate court Tayab was against the record and the law. Civil Court jurisdiction over section 26 of the West Pakistan Consolidation of Holdings Ordinance, 1969
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
