MUNIR AHMAD versus ELECTION COMMISSION OF PAKISTAN
Section 14 (3) Constitution Pakistan, Arts 62 (1) (E), (F), (G) and 199 Constitutional Petitions Please check the nomination papers of candidates by Returning Officers asking irrelevant and unwanted questions. In front of the live television, during the papers nomination scrutiny, the candidates were being examined by the intervention of the returning officers regarding their personal lives and the questions raised, along with the information submitted in the nomination. There was no relationship or alliance. Instead of increasing public confidence and trust by returning officers through some other means, moderate returning officers began raising inquiries directly by electronic media returning officers through personal questioning in front of electronic media returning officers. Has seriously damaged the image of Under Section 14 (3) of the Representation People Act, 1976, the law-tracking officer could conduct a summary inquiry on his own motion, but such an investigation was not a fishing or rotating inquiry into a candidate's personal affairs, his personal Neglecting religious affiliation with deep faith and deep roots can be questioned under the law. From the information placed before the Returning Officer, namely the information contained in the nomination papers and the objections filed against it on the other hand, if any, or by reliable sources, the information collected and collected by the Returning Officer, on behalf of the candidate. There was no reason to doubt the strength and sanctity of the declaration of nomination papers unless there was evidence to the contrary and Returning Officer Mick.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
