Section 230b (b) / / Q / 2d convictions, joint intentions, testimony of persistent evidence were brought to the record by prosecution witnesses who were closely related to the victim, as well as the presence of the complainant. The presence of witnesses was suspected at the scene. The location of the incident was located on the side of the road, a long distance from the complainant's residence and the defendant's incident was not a statement from the complainant and the prosecutor's witness that the deceased, despite receiving four fire shots, Contradicting the medical evidence brought by the record when the witnesses themselves were not present on the occasion, the incident could have happened much earlier than that, as the prosecutor suggested that very strong evidence was needed for the statements of the two. The witnesses who were concerned, interested and the witnesses of the occasion were made versions of the entire prosecution after the prosecution proceeded to prosecute. Rup had not been able to prove a charge against the accused beyond any reasonable shadow, the sentence passed by the trial court was not retained in the eyes of the law and the accused was acquitted. He was charged and released, under circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
