The CPC was dismissed on the applicants' non-submission under Section 12 (2), 141 and O IX R 13 Application Section 12 (2) because the applicant reinstated the petition because his lawyer had passed away. And therefore have no information. As determined under Section 12 (2), the application for a hearing to the accuracy procedure for deciding an application, was the same as that applicable to the dispute judgment and even to section 141, CPC. Under the suit, the CPC had a default procedure. As long as it can be applied to all proceedings in any court of civil jurisdiction if the application under section 12 (2), CPC is dismissed on non-submission, then OIX, under CPC The recommended method of rehabilitation will be applicable. The petition ground was upheld in the application for reinstatement of the application and at the same time the High Court allowed the application for restoration of the application under the circumstances under Section 12 (2), CPC.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
