PAK MOBILE COMMUNICATION versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN
Sections 27A, 2 (MB) and 2 (QB) under the Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 199 and 25 Constitutional Application Pakistan Telecommunication (Reorganization) Act, 1996 for the grant of the right of way through the public to licensees Receiving fees. The Telecommunications Company prevented and increased the fees charged by the Defendant Housing Authority (HA DHA \) and the Cantonment Board for providing access to land use rights for the installation of telephone towers. Increased on the basis of orders passed by the General Military Lands and Cantonment. And applicants were charged fees for the installation of the telephonic network and the applicants were given the DHA Accreditation License Rights Boards and the applicant's business was controlled. Therefore, the applicants cannot be disputed for the payment of the so-called fees, nor can the Pakistan Telecommunications (Reorganization) Act, 1996 nor the rules and regulations under it, be granted by any public authority The amount of fees charged for the supply and its use is not specified. Neither the Director General of Military Land and Cantonment, nor the Board of Management of Defense Housing Authority (HA DHA) had any authority under the Pakistan Telecommunication (Reorganization) Act, 1996, under any license. Determine the compensation or rate policy. Affected Fees Otherwise, the basic legislation of Cantonment and DHA lacked any technical or financial procedures to regulate the delivery of telecommunication services, nor did the telecom head
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
