Sections 302, 324, 148 and 149 of the conviction, the attempted murder of a fine, rioting, dismissal of a joint objection complaint were primarily based on two reasons that contradicted the defendant's brief statements. FIR and the accused were absconding The contents of the complaint as well as brief statements by the complainant's witnesses and other material have been disclosed in the crime report filed by the complainant shortly after the incident. Were in line. During the course of the search for the score, the court committed a gross misunderstanding and misreading of the material available on the record, which, by law, was not expected by any senior court officer to be such an unusual one. Accused, after filing an FIR, was charged, absconding. And after commencing proceedings under Section 87/88 88, he was declared an accused under CRPC; on the arrest of one accused, the other accused were given pre-arrest bail, and later acquitted. They also withdrew because of the grant. And when the complainant found out about this fact, he lodged a complaint, in which the accused did not appear and the police reported that he was absconding with the law trial court, in which case it is not permissible to dismiss the complaint. It was believed that the matter is old. Another accused was earlier declared to be a trial court's disclosure that the scheme related to the trial court's findings on the score was contrary to the law scheme that filing an action against the accused could delay the trial of the accused. Is. The principles of criminal justice were found in the eyes of the law
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
