Find a Lawyer

TANVIR AHMED versus STATE

Sections 7 (e), 17 and 32 of the Criminal Procedure Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 365A, 193 and 194 Criminal Procedure Code (v. 1898), Sections 561A and 476 Anti-Terrorism Court investigated and prosecuted the Inspector General of Police. Was instructed. In this case, according to the law, the prosecution and its witnesses, in connection with the allegations of forgery, fraud and fraud during proceedings in a private complaint, are required by the law to the Anti-Terrorism Court to appropriate cases against this person. I had the option to take action. In case any further investigation is needed, there is no doubt that the mistake or the police should be directed to investigate, no offense was scheduled under Section 193 and 194 against the PPC under the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, but According to its Section 17, the Anti-Terrorism Court can also try any crime. In addition to the scheduled offense with which the accused could be prosecuted under the same Tender Sections 193 and 194, PPC, Rule 1860 may also be imposed. During or in connection with the judicial proceedings, the provisions of the Code of Conduct, which were not yet in conflict with the provisions of the Anti-Terrorism Act 1997, were also applied before the Anti-Terrorism Court. With the implementation of section and section 767676 of the said Act, the CRPC shall be specifically excluded or referred to by the trial court for the Inspector General of Police's Investigation of Investigation to issue instructions for investigation and action. Was not inconsistent with the provisions of the Act used. The law was not subject to any kind of unlawful interference or irregularity because of the issue us immigration advocates from Chaghi lawyer