Find a Lawyer

JEHANGIR MALIK versus STATE

Sections 5, 6 and 9 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (v. 1898), the evidence against the accused 555 was to the extent that the statement of the police was to the extent that the accused had given him pay orders. Even if the aforesaid confession was proved before the trial court for subpoena, etc., it would have to be disputed in material details by means of other credible and strong evidence to use against the accused, as the evidence of a colleague. Can't accept. On the importance of the arrest of a co-accused on the report of a key accused, hardly any evidence can be presented about his involvement in the crime and he cannot be prosecuted on the same kind of proven evidence. I was placed in column number 2. After the police investigation, the accused were also charged for not being charged with challan, no question of the case can arise. Pointing to his involvement in the crime, the proceedings of the trial against the accused should be declared as a trial. immigration advocates from Dhoun Kal lawyer