Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQ versus STATE

The definition of sections 156 (1) (8) (89) and 185 of the evidence was upheld by the trial court holding that the defendant had excluded the cause of the offense simply because he claimed that Smart Gary, recovered from the possession of the co-accused. Cinnamon has been recovered. In any case, the trial court, as the accused in any case in the area of criminal justice, did not instruct the accused to re-include the words used in section 185A of the Customs Act, 1969, so that it could be included in the case. Have the proper foundations for To prosecute it, which was not sufficiently compliant with the law requirement, the trial court was obliged to record the grounds on which it was concluded that a report under section (1) of section (1) In the absence of Under section 185A of the Customs Act, 1969, proceedings against the accused will be initiated and should be included as the accused when such grounds have not been shown and the reasons are recorded, the trial court itself Only the wrong way was shown late in joining the accused in the case, which was taken up by the trial court so that it could not be guaranteed in the past. In this case, seriousness was taken against the accused. He dismissed the entire process as invalid and void and accordingly the decision was set aside. r \ n \ r. n online advocate from Killa Saifullah lawyer