Find a Lawyer

MANZOOR SHAIKH ALIAS MANZOOR AHMED versus STATE

The petitioner challenging the order passed by the magistrate challenging the cancellation of the orders of Sections 561A, 169, 170, 173 and 190, whereby he directed the police to furnish the challan within seven days. It was said that the magistrate had issued a cancellation order on the letter sent by Section P (Investigation). The case was started by the police after the FIR was lodged. After a valid investigation, the police had to seek evidence from the evidence collected by them whether the accused was involved in the case or if the police established the opinion that the accused was innocent. So the police had the power to release them. Under 169 CCPC, if the police established the opinion that there was sufficient evidence against the accused to be connected to the commission of the crime, then they had to make the accused into section 170. , Had to be sent to a competent magistrate under CR PC for review. In both cases, either section 696969, release of the accused under CRPC or section 7070, sending the accused to the magistrate under CRPC, section Section73, to the police, within the meaning of CRPC The invoice was required to be submitted and the government provided a pro forma magistrate for this. Jurisdiction to instruct the police to furnish challan on pro-government-provided forms, as well as their opinion of the accused involved or otherwise, and the Magistrate may then have the meaning of 5 190 190 or section 1773. I was required to pass the order, no order was issued except the PC Magistrate, the affected order, directed the police to submit the challan within seven days. The Syed order was legal and proper and there is no illegal act or irregularity in this order and it criminal advocate from Dudial lawyer