Find a Lawyer

ZAWAR ALIAS MUHAMMAD RAMZAN versus STATE

Section 1 33 Applic Diet Applicants / Plaintiffs who failed to pay the amount of the Diet on a specified date were paid and remanded in judicial custody until the statutory provision of Section 1 Val1 is sought The status quo is heard, the PPC also had to approve the order. Payment of dues in lump sum or installments which can extend up to 3 years from the date of judgment If the accused fails to pay the debt or any part thereof, he may be kept in jail till the amount is paid. The court was further given that no order was passed in this case if security or any part thereof was presented to the satisfaction of the trial court in the case of trial. In which the accused was directed to pay the money in installments of one lakh or so. Neither time had been set for payment of this amount without the request of the provisions of Articles 5 (1) and (2) of the PPC accused / applicants. In the circumstances, the court cannot be presented to the court. The trial court's unlawful and without jurisdiction disputes order, it was determined that the trial court was remanded so that it could be considered within the meaning of sub-sections (1) and (2) of 5331 of the PPC. Pass the appropriate order and then proceed according to the law. tax advocates from Khanewal lawyer