STATE (FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN) THROUGH THE COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS (PREVENTIVE) versus ANWAR KHATTAK
Section 282828 Customs Act (IV of 1969), Section 156 Additional Evidence, The prosecution could not produce the original confessional statements of the accused involved in the case on the basis of which they were convicted. Was not competent and before the trial court was out of its control, the appellate court should always keep in mind that there is a society, ie a third party, in criminal cases and if any party is outside its control. Based on the circumstances, no evidence can be produced in the case, which, if necessary, was allowed in the record, to present such additional evidence. Should have been brought, the prosecution on record was necessary, considering the circumstances of the case, so the prosecutor was allowed to head the aforesaid evidence. He was allowed to move the Special Court in the High Court Petition
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
