PERVAIZ versus STATE
Section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Section 392 bail, arrest of the accused was illegal because the police arrested them without collecting evidence. If the police officer could identify the accused, he could inform the police immediately and The names of the suspects could be mentioned. An FIR and its statement could have been filed earlier, but the record of the statements of the prosecution witnesses was delayed during which the statements of only the witnesses of interest were recorded. It is likely that the accused before the identification test. Witnesses were shown to the police station. Thirteen days after the arrest of the suspects, the detainees in the arrest proceedings were weighed, which cannot be countered, the identification test became suspicious; at the time of the arrest of the accused, the police collected solid evidence to confirm their arrest. Did not Testimony Needed For Re-Evidence Needed During the trial, subpoenas were entitled to bail in the circumstances.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Bhan Saeedabad lawyer
