Section 302/34 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) of the FIR was not alleged to have caused any injury to the victim, but the complainant later rectified his story through his supplementary statement. Distinguishing Injuries between the accused and the co-accused, the High Court rightly considered the above improvement dubious that the motive constituted by the prosecution had nothing to do with the accused and his involvement in the case. Was exonerated by the complaining party. The High Court was not shown wrong for acquittal of the accused; the complainant was denied circumstantial or shocking leave to appeal.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
