SAIN versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P. THROUGH SECRETARY, AUQAF
Article 11 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 12 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Decree, fraud and misrepresentation aside, evidence not proceeding before the Tribunal. There was no fraud in relation to. Or decisions were obtained in an appeal before the High Court and not through a false statement, the effect of the title of the property was decided on the basis of the question, the dispute, the decision made on the evidence presented to the petitioner, even though properly Exchange of roles and confirm the change. And even in subsequent entries in the Revenue Record, no objection was made to the change and correctness of the entries in the Revenue Record on the basis of the controversial change at any stage - Section 12 (2). The application under is misrepresenting. ), The CPC was not supported by any direct or circumstantial evidence. The leave to appeal to the tribunal or the High Court was denied. r \ n \ r \ n
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
jobs for advocates from Upper Deval lawyer