CHAND versus STATE
Section 302 (b) / 324 / 337f (iii) / constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3), successfully furnishing evidence against the applicant / accused, by presenting heavy evidence. ? The petitioner was not denied because he had requested his defense, but this could not be proved on the record and the trial court did not believe that the High Court had correctly stated the same offense registered by the trial court. Maintained that he was not a minor at the time. Under the commission of the crime, he was convicted / punished according to the law, the benefit of the minor could not be given to the accused, in the circumstances the application for leave of appeal was dismissed and the leave was rejected.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
female advocates from Chak 4 b c lawyer