HAJI ZARIN GUL AND ANOTHER versus MST. DIL ARA AND 5 OTHERS
O XXI, R 108 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Execution Procedure Objection Request Name Determination of suit property Memorandum of wrong order Following approval of the decree and during the proceedings, the applicants filed objections. The petitioner claimed he was the owner. The Property Executive Court granted permission to the statement of the holder of the injunction claiming to have been filed by the objector that on the basis of the registered sale deed she claims to be the owner. The Executive Court withdrew its earlier order and dismissed the petitioner's order to dismiss the objection filed by the Appellate Court and the Appellate Court, approved by the Executive Court, split the claim of ownership of the house for the first time. Was established during the execution of the decree passed in the trial of the case and despite the knowledge of the case, they did not put any effort into it. At any stage, assert their claim for accuracy during the intervention period. Declared, an impugned order was found to mislead the implementing court; therefore, the High Court, in its constitutional jurisdiction, No one can take exception that was not subject to any legal weakness or any permanent error in the judgment passed by the High Court. Or defects in reading or misreading evidence, the Supreme Court refuses to interfere with the High Court's decision
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
