Find a Lawyer

GHULAM NABI versus BAHADUR KHAN

Article 27 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) on payment of interest at no cost was not pressurized before the decision of the High Court suit for premature bail was appealed after the trial under trial. The Court amended and increased the trial court's order passed by the trial court to set aside the purchase price of the suit land from Rs. 30,000 to Rs. 80,000 as the vendor before the High Court. The second appeal was dismissed as the only question was raised before the High Court which was related to payment of interest at an unreasonable price. Section 27 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913, did not raise the question of justification for interest payment on unpaid sale price, which was a mixed question of law and fact which was neither raised in the lower appellate court nor higher. In the second appeal before the Court, the question was raised before the High Court was not allowed to appear before the Supreme Court Wendy at any stage, establishing a market-based sale price claim. In addition to the price in which the value of the land was based on the appellate court's agreement to sell, the said sale in the decree Without determining the market price according to section 27 of the Yamaat, Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913, the vendor has claimed that by the lower appellate court, fixing section 27 of the Punjab Pre-Emission Act, 1913 was not relevant. Appeal leave denied list of supreme court advocates from Issa Khel lawyer