RANA WAKEEL AHMED KHAN versus CHIEF ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF PAKISTAN
R 29 (2) Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 185 (3) Forbidding Polling Again the applicant was elected the moderator of the Union Council and was alleged to have forcibly stopped polling at a polling station and voted against the ballot paper. Stripped. The staff was issued a notification for re-polling, which the High Court had appointed under a notification in its constitutional jurisdiction. The High Court partially allowed the intra-court appeal against the decision. A total of 183 votes were cast at the disputed polling station, of which the applicant received 177 votes. Yet the remaining 6 votes were officially reported in the district. Submitted to the Returning Officer, who accepted the same opinion and ordered a re-polling, except that no contentious polling could be held on the contentious polling. The station was not possible because of the 183 votes, only the applicant could cast 177 votes and we had the remaining 6 votes presented by the Presiding Officer regarding the filing of votes by the District Returning Officer etc. The report can be re-validated and the High Court correctly passed the order under which the Supreme Court refused to interfere with the High Court's decision in the intra-court.
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
solicitors from Sibi lawyer