THE STATE THROUGH PROSECUTOR GENERAL, PUNJAB, LAHORE versus MUHAMMAD ASLAM
Section 497 (5) Conduct of the Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 336, 337 F (v), 337 F (vi), 341, 355, 148 and 149 Italhad i Salahiyat i Udw, Hashima Appeal to the accused was only available in the presence of Lalkar raising while the empty-handed accused was declared an empty-handed suspect, raising any question. The prosecution was unable to cite any material by the investigating agency, but no specific date, time or place was mentioned in connection with the conspiracy / release, as alleged, There was no risk of serious consequences. Prosecuting witnesses did not substantiate the recording of the rape in the newspaper with a court order, allegedly involving the accused in 43 cases, was of no use to the prosecution, as the accused was a political figure. ? d Member Provincial Assembly; Against this background, only the registration of cases against the accused had no basis for stopping the acceptance of the accused's bail or canceling the bail; there was no allegation of misuse of the bail exception by the accused. The controversial order of bail, well informed, reasonably and substantially in accordance with the law, will not demand any interference by the High Court to cancel the bail, was dismissed, in the circumstances \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
