Accused and allegedly executed on the basis of the statement of the Scope Company, a participant in the Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), sections 302/34 and 109 murder convictions, joint intentions, interim bail, further inquiries. Had committed murder. The charge against the accused was that he facilitated the escape of the accused after the incident. Neither the accused's name was listed in the FIR nor the policeman was involved in the case. His name was introduced by the complainant earlier in his supplemental statement to the police. The statement of the co-accused, which had already been granted bail by the trial court, was granted by another High Court bail to the accused in the statement of the accused against his co-accused. Could not have been considered or unless he had received the support of another independent source, the confessed accused had not suffered any injury upon his death and his presence only in the place of his presence concerned him. It was shown at the time that no weapons were recovered from the accused. The investigation of the case was completed after the recording of the evidence, the accused was behind bars for the last ten months and there was no witness to the prosecution. So far, his statement has been recorded when a further trial of the accused was sought in the trial court case against the accused.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
