Section 302 (b) Qatil Ahmed Evidence Testimony The benefit of the doubt, although reported to the police without harm, cannot be considered solely on the fact that the prosecution's version of credibility cannot be considered; Whether the police and the times were easily adjusted from the prosecution, the prosecution failed to prove its motive, but a wrong motive was set, both of the prosecution witnesses did not live near or around the incident, But they were residents of another village, about 4/5 km away. The presence of the incident reported that the two witnesses were also highly suspected of their non-physical activity to save the deceased or to prevent the accused at the scene of the incident. None of the witnesses tried to arrest the deceased. The facts confirmed the presence of highly suspicious persons in the presence of incidents Medical evidence was shocking and when the court denied the ocular account, it was considered a joke, there was no scandal. - Recovery of a blood-stained theft and its positive report was deemed to be controversial as evidence when the court agreed to dismiss the ocular evidence and deny that the prosecutor was without any suspicion. If the accused failed to prove his case, the accused's conviction and sentence were kept aside, the accused acquitted. The expansion was acquitted of the charges themselves. Suspect; and directed to release the suspect \ r \ n
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
