Sections 497 (2) and 498 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 409, 420, 468 and 471 of the Prevention of Corruption Act (Second of 1947), Section 5, criminal breach of trust, fraud, fraud and illegal contempt. Prior to the arrest warrant, further inquiries were made by the civil litigation complainant and an accused brother who was the director of a company, while the other accused was a bank manager accused of opening an account and embezzling company funds. The letter on the record stating that the principal accused was authorized to open and operate the account in the name of the company as the chief executive of the company and was made part of the account opening form of the company's chief executive address account. The opening form was mentioned in the year 2006, the accused was not the manager of the relevant branch and was not involved in changing the address of the company according to which the bank manager was Lab Lee, only in the trial phase. Only after recording the evidence can it be determined that sending the bank manager behind bars does not serve any useful purpose? The account may have been in operation for eight years and during this period the complainant and other directors were withdrawing their payments. During this period no other account was opened and operated by the accused director and interference in this case was pending that the civil litigation between the parties was pending, so the accused involved in the false allegation complained to the director. The arrest warrant was pre-arrest. It is allowed in the circumstances
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
