The conviction for appreciation of evidence with the good, common intention of Section 2 (2 (b) and Q 34 murder) was immediately reduced to an FIR, the suspect was shot from a rifle near the victim's shoulder. The prosecutor's witness was injured on the spot - there was a controversial version of the complainant in relation to the defendant's presence and details of the indictment, to the extent that the defendant's testimony, despite lengthy scrutiny, No material was removed in favor, which is the reason for both the prosecution's reasoning and understanding. The witnesses at the time and place of the incident did not rule out. It may be said, with the prosecution's witnesses as well as the deceased, that there was no basis for rejecting their testimony, if the same thing was true, and no material contradiction was admitted though between the accused and the accused, Nor was the previous indictment alleged between the prosecution's witnesses and the accused, but in the case of an injury to the body of the victim attributed to one of the accused, the alternative was a rare case, instead of the real culprit, the prosecution alleged. Trial of firearm injury in connection with defendant's involvement in intentional killing of Was not sufficiently proven. ), A PPC-based businessman was sentenced to life imprisonment by the trial court, given the circumstances under which the case was investigated.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2013
