CAPT. (RETD.) DR. MALIK JAVED TARIQ versus CHIEF SECRETARY, GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB, LAHORE
Section 8 Punjab Civil Servant (Appointment and Terms of Service) Rules 1974, R14 Punjab Service Tribunals Act (IX of 1974), Section 4 Promotion Intelligence Appellant Service Tribunal Appellant, BS 18 to rank the senior respondent and get the required qualification. Despite doing Diploma in public health was not considered for promotion in BS 19, and respondents, despite being the junior of the appellant, promoted the appellant in BS 19 as senior medical officer under Punjab based on seniorized fitness. I was to be included. The Department of Health (General / Specialist and Miscellaneous Posts) was fully eligible for the Rules 1981 and the Appellant Development when the Departmental Promotion Committee considered the development of the respondents in BS 19 and they were promoted to the Appellant. Harmful advertising was not considered. Despite being against anything, his personal right was not on record and was not fined in any way. Representatives of the disciplinary proceedings could not say when to advertise in the name of the appellant. Why not consider when the respondents were promoted to BS 19, there will be an unwanted order with the order that the appellant will be considered for promotion in BS 19. When his juniors were considered and promoted to the advanced level
Find a Lawyer Near You
Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.
🔍 Find a Lawyer
power of attorney advocate Kunjah lawyer